Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14681713›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2003

Fluid intake and epidemiology of urolithiasis.

R Siener, A Hesse

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05329389 (Adherence to Fluid Intake Recommendations After Stone Removal in Low Risk Group Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05329389 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Adherence to Fluid Intake Recommendations After Stone Removal in Low Risk Group Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorGadzhiev NarimanRan2023 to 2024Enrolled135ConditionsUrolithiasisArmsStoneMD, Schools of Patients, Standard recommendation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R SienerDivision of Experimental Urology, Department of Urology, University of Bonn, Germany. Roswitha.Siener@ukb.uni-bonn.de
A Hesse

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A low urine volume is an important risk factor in urinary stone formation. The present article summarizes available data from epidemiological and clinical studies to elucidate the impact of fluid intake and urine volume on the risk of urinary stone formation and the prevention of stone recurrence. A review of the literature shows that an increased urine volume achieved by a high fluid intake exerts an efficacious preventive effect on the onset and recurrence of urinary stones. A high water intake and urine dilution results in a marked reduction in saturation of lithogenous salts. The type of fluids should be carefully selected to achieve the appropriate change of urine composition depending on stone composition. A sufficient intake of fluid is one of the most important preventive measures for stone recurrence.

Indexed as

DiuresisDrinkingFluid TherapyHumansRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionUrinary Calculi

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.