Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14681394›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2004

DSDBASE: a consortium of native and modelled disulphide bonds in proteins.

A Vinayagam, G Pugalenthi, R Rajesh, R Sowdhamini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetically EncodedACS synthetic biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Rational Design of Disulfide Bridges inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. DSDBASE 2.0: updated version of DiSulphide dataBASE, a database on disulphide bonds in proteins.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Posttranslational protein modification in Archaea.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2005
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A VinayagamNational Centre for Biological Sciences, UAS-GKVK Campus, Bangalore 560065, India.
G Pugalenthi
R Rajesh
R Sowdhamini

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DSDBASE is a database of disulphide bonds in proteins, which provides information on native disulphides and those that are stereochemically possible between pairs of residues for all known protein structural entries. The modelling of disulphides has been performed, using MODIP, by the identification of residue pairs that can strainlessly accommodate a covalent cross-link. We also assess the stereochemical quality of the covalent cross-link and grade them appropriately. One of the potential uses of the database is to design site-directed mutants in order to enhance the thermal stability of a protein. The proposed sites of mutations can be viewed specifically with respect to active sites of enzymes and across physiological dimers. The occurrence of native and modelled disulphides increases the dimensions of the database enormously. This database can also be employed for proposing three-dimensional models of disulphide-rich short polypeptides. The database can be accessed from http://www.ncbs.res.in/ approximately faculty/mini/dsdbase/dsdbase.html. Supplementary information can be accessed from http://www.ncbs.res.in/ approximately faculty/mini/dsdbase/nar/suppl.htm.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinModels, MolecularAnimalsComputational BiologyDisulfidesHumansInternetMutationPeptidesProteinsSoftwareStructure-Activity RelationshipThermodynamicsUser-Computer InterfaceDisulfidesPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID14681394
PMCPMC308760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.