Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14680328›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2003

Proteomics in zebrafish exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals.

E A Shrader, T R Henry, M S Greeley, B P Bradley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Finding biomarkers is getting easier.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2012
    Review
  8. DIGE and iTRAQ as biomarker discovery tools in aquatic toxicology.Ecotoxicology and environmental safety · 2012
    Review
  9. Peptide biomarkers as evidence of perchlorate biodegradation.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Toxicogenomics in regulatory ecotoxicology.Environmental science & technology · 2006
    Article
  18. Proteomics of early zebrafish embryos.BMC developmental biology · 2006
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E A ShraderUniversity of Maryland (UMBC), 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.
T R Henry
M S Greeley
B P Bradley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic zebrafish were examined for changes in protein expression following exposure to sublethal concentrations of 17beta-estradiol (E2) and the estrogen mimic 4-nonylphenol (4-NP). Protein Expression Signatures were derived from embryo homogenates by two-dimensional electrophoresis and digital imaging. In both experiments approximately 30% of the proteins sampled were specific to either E2 or 4-NP and about 33% were common to the control, 4-NP and E2. However, of the proteins induced by either E2 or 4-NP, 28% were common to both chemicals at 1 ppm but only 7% were common to both at 0.1 ppm. While there are many proteins that respond specifically to each chemical, relatively few are common to the two chemicals suggesting that the response pathways of the two chemicals are distinct.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingProtein Array AnalysisProteomicsAnimalsElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalEmbryo, NonmammalianEndocrine SystemEstradiolMutagenicity TestsPhenolsZebrafish4-nonylphenolEstradiolPhenols

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.