Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14678280›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2004

Autoantibodies recognizing citrullinated rat filaggrin in an ELISA using citrullinated and non-citrullinated recombinant proteins as antigens are highly diagnostic for rheumatoid arthritis.

O Vittecoq, B Incaurgarat, F Jouen-Beades, J Legoedec, O Letourneur, D Rolland, G Gervasi, J F Ménard, A Gayet, P Fardellone and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

O VittecoqINSERM unité 519 and Institut Fédératif de Recherche Multidisciplinaire sur les Peptides (IFR 23), Faculté Mixte de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, France. olivier.vittecoq@chu-rouen.fr
B Incaurgarat
F Jouen-Beades
J Legoedec
O Letourneur
D Rolland
G Gervasi
J F Ménard
A Gayet
P Fardellone
A Daragon
M Jolivet
X le Loët
F Tron
bioMérieux (France) · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine the diagnostic value for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of anti-filaggrin autoantibodies (autoAb) recognizing citrullinated recombinant rat filaggrin (ACRF) in community cases of very early arthritis. To evaluate the diagnostic value of ACRF, were studied sera from patients with different classified rheumatic diseases and healthy subjects (group 1, n= 422) and 314 community cases of very early arthritis (group 2) that were classified as RA (n = 176), non-RA (n = 63) and undifferentiated (n = 75) arthritides after 1 years of follow-up. ACRF were measured using a new ELISA, with results expressed as the difference between the OD value obtained on citrullinated minus that on noncitrullinated rat filaggrin (differential ACRF; dACRF). For both groups, rheumatoid factors (RF), anti-keratin autoAb (AKA) and anti-perinuclear factor (APF) were tested; for group 2, anti-CCP autoAb were also tested. Different reactivity patterns against citrullinated and noncitrullinated filaggrin were observed. Almost all sera reacting with citrullinated but not noncitrullinated filaggrin were from RA patients. Among RA and non-RA sera that recognized both forms of filaggrin, a positive result was obtained only with RA sera. For groups 1 and 2, dACRF sensitivity was 58.4% and 30.7%, and specificity for RA was 99.5% and 98.4%, respectively. In group 2, dACRF specificity for RA was better than that of RF (92.1%), APF (95.2%), AKA (96.8%) and anti-CCP (95.2%). dACRF positive predictive value was high (98.2) and close to that given by the concomitant positivity of RF and anti-CCP autoAb. Despite a high positive correlation between AKA, APF, anti-CCP and dACRF test results, they were complementary since some sera were positive for only one test. Thus, in a community setting, anti-citrullinated rat filaggrin reactivity detected by a new ELISA, whose originality is based on the difference between serum's reactivities on the citrullinated and native forms of filaggrin, had a higher diagnostic value for RA than other autoAb.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCitrullineEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFilaggrin ProteinsFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansIntermediate Filament ProteinsKeratinsMaleAutoantibodiesBiomarkersCitrullineFilaggrin ProteinsFLG protein, humanIntermediate Filament ProteinsKeratinsRecombinant ProteinsRheumatoid Factor

Identifiers

PMID14678280
PMCPMC1808924
OpenAlexW2052622082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.