Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14676284›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2004

S4 movement in a mammalian HCN channel.

Sriharsha Vemana, Shilpi Pandey, H Peter Larsson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Extracellular salt bridge networks around S4 implicated in HCN channel gating and heart disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A second S4 movement opens hyperpolarization-activated HCN channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Bipolar switching by HCN voltage sensor underlies hyperpolarization activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Insights into the molecular mechanism for hyperpolarization-dependent activation of HCN channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sriharsha VemanaNeurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.
Shilpi Pandey
H Peter Larsson
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of voltage-gated ion channelsR01NS043259 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LARSSON, HANS PETER · 2003 to 2006
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS NS043259NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS043259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels (HCN) mediate an inward cation current that contributes to spontaneous rhythmic firing activity in the heart and the brain. HCN channels share sequence homology with depolarization-activated Kv channels, including six transmembrane domains and a positively charged S4 segment. S4 has been shown to function as the voltage sensor and to undergo a voltage-dependent movement in the Shaker K+ channel (a Kv channel) and in the spHCN channel (an HCN channel from sea urchin). However, it is still unknown whether S4 undergoes a similar movement in mammalian HCN channels. In this study, we used cysteine accessibility to determine whether there is voltage-dependent S4 movement in a mammalian HCN1 channel. Six cysteine mutations (R247C, T249C, I251C, S253C, L254C, and S261C) were used to assess S4 movement of the heterologously expressed HCN1 channel in Xenopus oocytes. We found a state-dependent accessibility for four S4 residues: T249C and S253C from the extracellular solution, and L254C and S261C from the internal solution. We conclude that S4 moves in a voltage-dependent manner in HCN1 channels, similar to its movement in the spHCN channel. This S4 movement suggests that the role of S4 as a voltage sensor is conserved in HCN channels. In addition, to determine the reason for the different cAMP modulation and the different voltage range of activation in spHCN channels compared with HCN1 channels, we constructed a COOH-terminal-deleted spHCN. This channel appeared to be similar to a COOH-terminal-deleted HCN1 channel, suggesting that the main functional differences between spHCN and HCN1 channels are due to differences in their COOH termini or in the interaction between the COOH terminus and the rest of the channel protein in spHCN channels compared with HCN1 channels.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneCyclic AMPCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsCysteineElectrophysiologyHyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated ChannelsIon Channel GatingIon ChannelsMammalsMembrane PotentialsMiceMutagenesis, Site-DirectedOocytesPotassium ChannelsSea UrchinsCyclic AMPCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsCysteineHcn1 protein, mouseHyperpolarization-Activated Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated ChannelsIon ChannelsPotassium ChannelsShaker Superfamily of Potassium Channels

Identifiers

PMID14676284
PMCPMC2217412
OpenAlexW2129725348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.