Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14671644›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2004

Interleukin-3 receptor in acute leukemia.

U Testa, R Riccioni, D Diverio, A Rossini, F Lo Coco, C Peschle

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multi-targeted immunotherapeutics to treat B cell malignancies.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Immunotherapy in AML: a brief review on emerging strategies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

U TestaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, Rome, Italy. u.testa@iss.it
R Riccioni
D Diverio
A Rossini
F Lo Coco
C Peschle
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITSt. Eugenio Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that abnormalities of the interleukin-3 receptor (IL-3R) are frequently observed in acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) and may contribute to the proliferative advantage of leukemic blasts. This review analyzes the evidences indicating that the IL-3R represents one of the target molecules involved in the stimulation of proliferation of AMLs, and the overexpression of the IL-3Ralpha chain may represent one of the mechanisms contributing to the development of a highly malignant leukemic phenotype. Furthermore, there is evidence that the IL-3Ralpha is a marker of leukemic stem cells, at variance with normal stem cells that are IL-3Ralpha-. Finally, the IL-3R may represent an important target for the development of new antileukemic drugs.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansInterleukin-3 Receptor alpha SubunitLeukemia, MyeloidNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplastic Stem CellsReceptors, Interleukin-3IL3RA protein, humanInterleukin-3 Receptor alpha SubunitNeoplasm ProteinsReceptors, Interleukin-3

Identifiers

PMID14671644
OpenAlexW2069317205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.