Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14668485›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2004

A striking quality control subcompartment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the endoplasmic reticulum-associated compartment.

Gregory Huyer, Gaby L Longsworth, Deborah L Mason, Monica P Mallampalli, J Michael McCaffery, Robin L Wright, Susan Michaelis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Role of Pbr1, a putative oxidoreductase, in the ER quality control and folding of yeast Fks1 glucan synthase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory HuyerDepartment of Cell Biology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Gaby L Longsworth
Deborah L Mason
Monica P Mallampalli
J Michael McCaffery
Robin L Wright
Susan Michaelis
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Trafficking of ABC proteins in yeastR01GM051508 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAELIS, SUSAN D. · 1994 to 2010
$3.3M
Zeiss LSM 510 META Confocal MicroscopeS10RR019409 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCCAFFERY, J. MICHAEL · 2004 to 2004
$485k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR019409NIGMS NIH HHS GM-51508NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM051508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The folding of nascent secretory and membrane proteins is monitored by the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) quality control system. Misfolded proteins are retained in the ER and can be removed by ER-associated degradation. As a model for the ER quality control of multispanning membrane proteins in yeast, we have been studying mutant forms of Ste6p. Here, we identify mislocalized mutant forms of Ste6p that induce the formation of, and localize to, prominent structures that are absent in normal cells. We have named these structures ER-associated compartments (ERACs), based on their juxtaposition to and connection with the ER, as observed by fluorescence and electron microscopy. ERACs comprise a network of tubulo-vesicular structures that seem to represent proliferated ER membranes. Resident ER lumenal and membrane proteins are present in ERACs in addition to their normal ER localization, suggesting there is no barrier for their entry into ERACs. However, the forms of Ste6p in ERACs are excluded from the ER and do not enter the secretory pathway; instead, they are ultimately targeted for ER-associated degradation. The presence of ERACs does not adversely affect secretory protein traffic through the ER and does not lead to induction of the unfolded protein response. We propose that ERACs may be holding sites to which misfolded membrane proteins are specifically diverted so as not to interfere with normal cellular functions. We discuss the likelihood that related ER membrane proliferations that form in response to certain other mutant or unassembled membrane proteins may be substantially similar to ERACs.

Indexed as

ATP-Binding Cassette TransportersGlycoproteinsProtein FoldingSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBiological TransportEndoplasmic ReticulumFungal ProteinsIntracellular MembranesMicroscopy, ImmunoelectronMutationProtein TransportSaccharomyces cerevisiaeATP-Binding Cassette TransportersFungal ProteinsGlycoproteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSTE6 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID14668485
PMCPMC329403
OpenAlexW2109951669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.