Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14664772›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2004

Visual Hallucinations.

Victoria S. Pelak, Grant T. Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria S. PelakDepartments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 1635 North Ursula Street, Box F727, Aurora, CO 80010, USA. Victoria.Pelak@UCHSC.edu
Grant T. Liu
University of Colorado Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurologists and ophthalmologists should be familiar with the causes and treatment of visual hallucinations so that they are able to reassure patients and minimize the anguish associated with untreated visual hallucinations. Hallucinations are under-reported by patients because of the perceived psychiatric implication or because of poor insight into the unreal nature of the hallucinations. In the appropriate setting, physicians should specifically inquire about hallucinations as well as initiate medical treatment. Visual hallucinations have many etiologies and are associated with a variety of disorders. Identification of the associated disorder or cause is necessary to determine the appropriate treatment. Causes and associated disorders include ocular phenomena, migraine, seizures, visual loss (ie, release hallucinations), neurodegenerative disorders, midbrain injury, alcohol and drug effects, narcolepsy, post-traumatic stress disorder, and psychosis. Therapeutic treatment should be directed at the associated disorder or etiology. For instance, antiepileptic drugs may be appropriate for patients with irritative phenomena such as seizures and visual aura of migraine. Depending on the cause, other agents are available and include neuroleptics, cholinesterase inhibitors, and acetazolamide. Well-designed, randomized, controlled clinical trials regarding treatment of visual hallucinations associated with various disorders are lacking. Although complete resolution of visual hallucinations can be difficult, even minimal improvement may be symptomatically beneficial.

Identifiers

PMID14664772
OpenAlexW4210561899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.