Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14662952›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003

Comparison of the susceptibilities of Candida spp. to fluconazole and voriconazole in a 4-year global evaluation using disk diffusion.

Kevin C Hazen, Ellen Jo Baron, Arnaldo Lopes Colombo, Corrado Girmenia, Aurora Sanchez-Sousa, Amalia del Palacio, Catalina de Bedout, David L Gibbs, Global Antifungal Surveillance Group

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Drug Resistance and Biofilm Formation inIranian journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Biographical Feature: Ellen Jo Baron, M.S., Ph.D.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transcriptomics Analysis of Candida albicans Treated with Huanglian Jiedu Decoction Using RNA-seq.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2016
    Article
  8. Emergence of azole-resistantCurrent medical mycology · 2015
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The effect of biomaterials and antifungals on biofilm formation by Candida species: a review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kevin C HazenDepartment of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA. khazen@virginia.edu
Ellen Jo Baron
Arnaldo Lopes Colombo
Corrado Girmenia
Aurora Sanchez-Sousa
Amalia del Palacio
Catalina de Bedout
David L Gibbs
Global Antifungal Surveillance Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From June 1997 to December 2001, results of in vitro susceptibility tests of yeast isolates from 35 countries were collected. For 2001 alone, fluconazole results were reported for 22,111 yeast isolates from 77 institutions in 30 countries. Of these isolates, 18,569 were also tested for susceptibility to voriconazole. All study sites tested clinical yeast isolates by recently endorsed NCCLS disk diffusion method M44-P. Disk test plates were automatically read and results were recorded with the BIOMIC Image Analysis System. Species, drug, zone diameter, susceptibility category, MIC, and quality control results were electronically submitted by e-mail quarterly for analysis. Duplicate test results (same patient and same species with same sensitivity-resistance profile and biotype results during any 7-day period) and uncontrolled test results were eliminated from this analysis. The proportion of Candida albicans isolates decreased from 69.7% in 1997 to 1998 to 63.0% in 2001, and this decrease was accompanied by a concomitant increase in C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis. The susceptibility (susceptible [S]or susceptible-dose dependent [S-DD]) of C. albicans isolates to fluconazole was virtually unchanged, from 99.2% in 1997 to 99% in 2001; the C. glabrata response to fluconazole was unchanged, from 81.5% S or S-DD in 1997 to 81.7% in 2001, although the percentage of resistant isolates from blood and upper respiratory tract samples appeared to increase over the study period; the percentage of S C. parapsilosis isolates decreased slightly, from 98% S or S-DD in 1997 to 96% in 2001; and the percentage of S isolates of C. tropicalis increased slightly, from 95.7% in 1997 to 96.9% in 2001. The highest rate of resistance to fluconazole among C. albicans isolates was noted in Ecuador (7.6%, n = 250). Results from this investigation indicate that the susceptibility of yeast isolates to fluconazole has changed minimally worldwide over the 4.5-year study period and that voriconazole demonstrated 10- to 100-fold greater in vitro activity than fluconazole against most yeast species.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasisDiffusionFluconazoleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsFluconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID14662952
PMCPMC309015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.