ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2003
Acquisition and duration of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal carriage in relation to strain type.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural history of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE): a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2014Pooled it
- Trends and significance of VRE colonization in the ICU: a meta-analysis of published studies.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Enterococcus faecium genome dynamics during long-term asymptomatic patient gut colonization.Microbial genomics · 2019Article
- Duration of colonization with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria after ICU discharge.Intensive care medicine · 2014Article
- Persistence of colonisation with MDRO following discharge from the ICU.Intensive care medicine · 2014Article
- Rapid curbing of a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium outbreak in a nephrology department.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2009Article
- Longer intestinal persistence of Enterococcus faecalis compared to Enterococcus faecium clones in intensive-care-unit patients.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2009Article
- Successful control of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium outbreak in a neurosurgical unit at non-endemic region.Emerging health threats journal · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In May 2000, the first outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) was detected in the University Medical Center Utrecht in the nephrology ward. The question arose why some VREF strains spread among hospitalized patients, whereas other strains do not. Thirty patients who were found to be colonized with VREF between May and November 2000 were included in the study. Molecular typing confirmed that 19 of them carried an identical epidemic strain which harbored the esp gene while 11 were colonized by nonepidemic strains that were all esp negative. Acquisition of the outbreak strain was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus, renal transplantation, and extensive use of antibiotics, especially cephalosporins, in the 2-month period before the first isolation of VREF. To establish the duration of colonization, prospective surveillance of VREF carriage for a 6-month period starting from the first isolation of VREF was realized for 20 patients. After 6 months, VREF was still recovered from 60% of carriers of the outbreak strain versus 20% of carriers of nonepidemic strains (P < 0.01). However, antibiotic use during the follow-up period was significantly higher by carriers of the outbreak strain than by carriers of nonepidemic strains. The fact that the outbreak strain was recovered for a longer period of time than nonepidemic strains may facilitate dissemination of the strain. The results support a careful restrictive antibiotic policy for wards at risk for spread of VREF and implementation of isolation precautions for patients who are colonized with esp-positive outbreak strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.