Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14662354›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2003

Chromosome segregation in Eubacteria.

Kit Pogliano, Joe Pogliano, Eric Becker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cell size control in bacteria.Current biology : CB · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Diversity and redundancy in bacterial chromosome segregation mechanisms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2005
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kit PoglianoDivision of Biological Sciences, 9500 Gilman Drive, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0349, USA. kpogliano@ucsd.edu
Joe Pogliano
Eric Becker
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

FORESPORE ENGULFMENT DURING B SUBTILIS SPORULATIONR01GM057045 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI POGLIANO, KIT J · 1998 to 2021
$6.1M
Septum Asymmetry as a Cell Fate DeterminantF32GM065692 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI BECKER, ERIC C · 2002 to 2004
$125k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM065692NIGMS NIH HHS GM 57045NIGMS NIH HHS GM 65692NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now clear that bacterial chromosomes rapidly separate in a manner independent of cell elongation, suggesting the existence of a mitotic apparatus in bacteria. Recent studies of bacterial cells reveal filamentous structures similar to the eukaryotic cytoskeleton, proteins that mediate polar chromosome anchoring during Bacillus subtilis sporulation, and SMC interacting proteins that are involved in chromosome condensation. A picture is thereby developing of how bacterial chromosomes are organized within the cell, how they are separated following duplication, and how these processes are coordinated with the cell cycle.

Indexed as

BacteriaChromosomes, BacterialChromosome Segregation

Identifiers

PMID14662354
PMCPMC3919143
OpenAlexW2165864040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.