Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14656845›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

Adrenaline in the treatment of anaphylaxis: what is the evidence?

Andrew P C McLean-Tooke, Claire A Bethune, Ann C Fay, Gavin P Spickett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Glucocorticoids for the treatment of anaphylaxis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Perioperative anaphylaxis: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Idiopathic Anaphylaxis? Analysis of Data from the Anaphylaxis Registry for West Pomerania Province, Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew P C McLean-TookeRegional Department of Immunology and Allergy, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP. andrew.mclean-tooke@nuth.northy.nhs.uk
Claire A Bethune
Ann C Fay
Gavin P Spickett

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisDrug Administration RoutesDrug Administration ScheduleEpinephrineEquipment DesignHumansSyringesEpinephrine

Identifiers

PMID14656845
PMCPMC286326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.