SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003
Indirect comparison meta-analysis of aspirin therapy after coronary surgery.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Biological efficacy of low versus medium dose aspirin after coronary surgery: results from a randomized trial [NCT00262275].BMC medicine · 2006Trial
- What is the optimal antiplatelet therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy combinations with or without chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a modelling approach.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Graft thrombosis after coronary artery bypass surgery and current practice for prevention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Pleiotropic Effects of Acetylsalicylic Acid after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting-Beyond Platelet Inhibition.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Pre-operative use of aspirin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Vein graft failure: from pathophysiology to clinical outcomes.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2016Review
- Expert position paper on the management of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.European heart journal · 2014Article
- Aspirin resistance - does it clinically matter?Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2006Review
- 'Lost in translation': accounting for between-country differences in the analysis of multinational cost-effectiveness data.PharmacoEconomics · 2006Review
- Aspirin dosage for the prevention of graft occlusion in people undergoing coronary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Avicenna journal of medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of low and medium dose aspirin therapy after coronary surgery by using an indirect comparison meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials register, and trial register sites on the internet. STUDY SELECTION: Outcome was evaluated by angiography and reported as graft occlusion and rate of events in patients. Trials that did not include aspirin as the sole therapy or did not have a placebo control arm were excluded. Articles were assessed for eligibility and quality and grouped according to dosage. The estimated difference in effect of low and medium dose aspirin on graft occlusion was obtained by combining the estimated log relative risks of low dose with placebo and medium dose with placebo.
resultsFor graft occlusion, the medium dose trials yielded a relative risk reduction of 45% compared with 26% for the low dose trials. The greater effect in the medium dose trials is summarised by a relative risk ratio of 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.52 to 1.06; P = 0.10) for graft occlusion and 0.81 (0.57 to 1.16; P = 0.25) for events in patients.
conclusionsMedium dose aspirin may more successfully reduce graft occlusion than low dose regimens within the first year after coronary surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.