Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14654701›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2003

Residues 190-210 of human topoisomerase I are required for enzyme activity in vivo but not in vitro.

Morten O Christensen, Hans U Barthelmes, Fritz Boege, Christian Mielke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Morten O ChristensenInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Medical School, Moorenstrasse 5, D-40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Hans U Barthelmes
Fritz Boege
Christian Mielke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-topoisomerase I (topo I) unwinds the DNA- double helix by cutting one strand and allowing rotation of the other. In vitro, this function does not require the N-terminal domain of the enzyme, which is believed to regulate cellular properties. To assess this role, we studied the cellular distribution and mobility of green fluorescent protein-chimera of human topo I lacking either the entire N-terminal domain or a portion of it. We find that topo I truncated up to position 210 is not stabilized by camptothecin in covalent DNA-complexes inside a living cell, whereas in vitro it retains full DNA-relaxation activity, and is targeted by camptothecin in the usual manner. This difference is not shared with a fragment lacking the N-terminal domain up to position 190, indicating that residues 190-210 play a crucial role for the activity of the enzyme in its physiological environment, but not in vitro. Since it is impossible to discriminate in vivo whether this region is required for topo I to form covalent DNA intermediates in the cell, or just for camptothecin to bind and stabilize such complexes, we could not explain precisely these cellular observations. However, inactivity in vivo of the enzyme lacking this region is indicated by a lesser cytotoxicity.

Indexed as

CamptothecinCatalytic DomainCell-Free SystemCell LineDNADNA Topoisomerases, Type IDrug ResistanceHumansOsmolar ConcentrationProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein TransportSaltsSequence DeletionTopoisomerase I InhibitorsCamptothecinDNADNA Topoisomerases, Type ISaltsTopoisomerase I Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID14654701
PMCPMC291868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.