Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1465383›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1992

The PR264/c-myb connection: expression of a splicing factor modulated by a nuclear protooncogene.

A Sureau, J Soret, M Vellard, J Crochet, B Perbal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evidence for the function of an exonic splicing enhancer after the first catalytic step of pre-mRNA splicing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Several mRNAs with variable 3' untranslated regions and different stability encode the human PR264/SC35 splicing factor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1994
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A SureauLaboratoire d'Oncologie Virale et Moléculaire, Institut Curie, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, France.
J Soret
M Vellard
J Crochet
B Perbal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously reported that expression of the c-myb gene in normal avian thymic cells proceeds through the intermolecular recombination of ET (thymus-specific) and c-myb coding sequences, thereby generating a novel type of c-myb product. Antisense transcripts expressed from the ET locus encode the extremely well-conserved splicing factor PR264/SC35. We now show that the human PR264 promoter sequences contain several myb-recognition elements that efficiently interact in vitro with the c-myb DNA-binding domain. Moreover, expression from the PR264 promoter is transactivated, both in vitro and in cultured cells, by different c-myb products. Thus, the PR264 gene is most likely a physiological target for the c-myb family of transcription factors.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticRNA SplicingAnimalsBase SequenceChickensDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression RegulationHeLa CellsHematopoiesisHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMolecular Sequence DataNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mybRestriction MappingDNA-Binding ProteinsNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mybRibonucleoproteinsRNA, MessengerSerine-Arginine Splicing FactorsSRSF2 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID1465383
PMCPMC50620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.