Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14652325›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2003

Globalization and health at the United States-Mexico border.

Núria Homedes, Antonio Ugalde

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The United States-Mexico border environmental public health: the challenges of working with two systems.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Of mice and men: defining, categorizing and understanding the significance of zoonotic infections.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2011
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Challenges and opportunities in border health.Preventing chronic disease · 2005
    Review
  12. Global trade and public health.American journal of public health · 2005
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Núria HomedesSchool of Public Health, University of Texas, Houston, USA. nhomedes@utep.edu
Antonio Ugalde

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe studied the impact of globalization on the making of health policy. Globalization is understood as economic interdependence among nations. The North American Free Trade Agreement is used as a marker to assess the effects of economic interdependence on binational health cooperation along the United States-Mexico border.

methodsWe observed participants and conducted in-depth interviews with policymakers, public health specialists, representatives of professional organizations, and unions.

resultsGlobalization has not promoted binational health policy cooperation. Barriers that keep US and Mexican policymakers apart prevail while health problems that do not recognize international borders go unresolved.

conclusionsIf international health problems are to be solved, political, cultural, and social interdependence need to be built with the same impetus by which policymakers promote international trade.

Indexed as

Public Health AdministrationCommerceCommunicable Disease ControlCommunicable DiseasesEmigration and ImmigrationHealth PolicyHealth PrioritiesHealth Services ResearchHumansInterinstitutional RelationsInternational CooperationInterviews as TopicMexicoOrganizational ObjectivesPolicy MakingTexas

Identifiers

PMID14652325
PMCPMC1448143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.