Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14645951›Full record

ReviewTobacco control2003

From legitimate consumers to public relations pawns: the tobacco industry and young Australians.

S M Carter

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tobacco control, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Zonnic®: a new player in an old field.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

S M CarterSchool of Public Health, Room 128A Building A27, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. carters@health.usyd.edu.au
New South Wales Department of Health · AU

Funding

Analysis of tobacco industry documents--Asia/AustraliaR01CA087110 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY · PI CHAPMAN, SIMON · 2001 to 2004
$817k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA87110-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo document the Australian tobacco industry's activities regarding youth smoking to support tobacco control.

method492 industry documents from primary and secondary websites were abstracted and analysed.

resultsAustralian legislation and rhetoric on youth and tobacco has changed dramatically over the last 50 years, from an unproblematic association of teenagers and smoking in the 1960s, through the industry's aggressive attacks and denials in the 1980s, to the 1990s, when industry became newly compliant with "societal expectations" and youth became a dominant bargaining issue in the industry's public relations strategy. The industry's current policy is to simultaneously blame others for underage smoking, frame the industry as socially responsible via voluntary marketing codes, youth access programmes, and school education, and market actively to young adults.

conclusionsThe arbitrary distinction between 17 and 18 year olds is, particularly in Australia's dark market, a liability for tobacco control and an opportunity for the industry, which is attempting to claim the high moral ground traditionally occupied by tobacco control on the youth issue. The current review of Australia's Tobacco Advertising Prohibition Act of 1992 should prohibit all forms of industry communication targeting young people, including retail access and schools programmes and below-the-line marketing. Tobacco control advocacy should highlight the industry's attempts to use the youth issue in its own favour while laying the blame elsewhere.

Indexed as

Public RelationsSmokingTobacco IndustryAdolescentAustraliaCodes of EthicsHumansInternational CooperationMarketingOrganizational Policy

Identifiers

PMID14645951
PMCPMC1766123
OpenAlexW1987749647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.