ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2003
From evidence to best practice in the management of fractures of the distal radius in adults: working towards a research agenda.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rehabilitation for distal radial fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Bone grafts and bone substitutes for treating distal radial fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Different methods of external fixation for treating distal radial fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- External fixation versus conservative treatment for distal radial fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007Pooled it
- Conservative interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003Pooled it
- Closed reduction methods for treating distal radial fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003Pooled it
- Moulded cast compared with K-wire fixation after manipulation of an acute dorsally displaced distal radius fracture: the DRAFFT 2 RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2022Trial
- Surgical fixation with K-wires versus casting in adults with fracture of distal radius: DRAFFT2 multicentre randomised clinical trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Trial
- Percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires versus volar locking plate fixation in adults with dorsally displaced fracture of distal radius: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2014Trial
- UK DRAFFT - a randomised controlled trial of percutaneous fixation with kirschner wires versus volar locking-plate fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2011Trial
- Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures with Bridging External Fixator with Optional Percutaneous K-Wires: What Are the Right Indications for Patient Age, Gender, Dominant Limb and Injury Pattern?Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Scoping review of priority setting of research topics for musculoskeletal conditions.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Percutaneous pinning versus volar locking plate fixation for dorsally displaced distal radius fractures- reoperation rates over an eight year period.Journal of orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Article
- The evolution of distal radius fracture management: a historical treatise.Hand clinics · 2012Article
- Comparison of external fixation, locking and non-locking palmar plating for unstable distal radius fractures in the elderly.International orthopaedics · 2009Article
- The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) can measure the impairment, activity limitations and participation restriction constructs from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2008Article
- The Cochrane Collaboration: a leading role in producing reliable evidence to inform healthcare decisions in musculoskeletal trauma and disorders.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2008Article
- An X-ray template assessment for distal radial fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFracture of the distal radius is a common clinical problem, particularly in older white women with osteoporosis. We report our work towards evidence-based and patient-centred care for adults with these injuries.
methodsWe developed a systematic programme of research that built on our systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness of treatment interventions for these fractures. We devised schemata showing 'typical' care pathways and identified over 100 patient management questions. These depicted the more important decisions taken when progressing along each care pathway. We compiled a comprehensive document summarising the evidence available for each decision point from our reviews of randomised trials of treatment interventions. Using these documents, we undertook a formal and structured consultation process involving key players, including a patient representative, to obtain their views on the available evidence and to establish a research agenda. The resulting feedback was then processed and interpreted, using systematic methods.
resultsSome evidence from 114 randomised trials was available for 31 of the 117 patient management questions. However, there was sufficient evidence to base some conclusions of effectiveness for particular interventions in only five of these. Though only 60% of those approached responded, the responses received from the consultation group were often comprehensive and provided important insights into treatment practice and policy. There was a clear acceptance of the aims of the project and, aside from some suggestions for the more explicit inclusion of secondary prevention and management of complications, of the care pathways scheme. Though some respondents stressed that randomised trials were not always appropriate, there was no direct overall criticism of the evidence document and underlying processes. We were able to identify important core themes that underpin management decisions and research from the feedback of the consultation exercise.
conclusionsOverall, this project is an important advance towards evidence-based and patient-centred management of adults with distal radial fractures. It exposes the serious deficiency in the available evidence but also provides a template for further action. As well as being a valuable basis for viewing and informing current practice, the insights gained from this project should inform a future research agenda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.