Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14638757›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2003

Divergent interactions of Ehrlichia chaffeensis- and Anaplasma phagocytophilum-infected leukocytes with endothelial cell barriers.

Jinho Park, Kyoung-Seong Choi, Dennis J Grab, J Stephen Dumler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acquired tick resistance inInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  2. Innate immunity in rickettsial infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Frontiers in public health · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Alternative Splicing of Differentiated Myeloid Cell Transcripts after Infection byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. New and emerging infectious diseases.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2005
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinho ParkDivision of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Kyoung-Seong Choi
Dennis J Grab
J Stephen Dumler
Johns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

EHRLICHIA-GRANULOCYTE INTERACTIONS AND INFECTIONR01AI044102 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI DUMLER, JOHN STEPHEN · 2000 to 2019
$5.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044102NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI44102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human anaplasmosis (formerly human granulocytic ehrlichiosis) and human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) are emerging tick-borne infections caused by obligate intracellular bacteria in the family Anaplasmataceae. Clinical findings include fever, headache, myalgia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and hepatic inflammatory injury. Whereas Ehrlichia chaffeensis (HME) often causes meningoencephalitis, this is rare with Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection. The abilities of infected primary host monocytes and neutrophils and of infected HL-60 cells to cross human umbilical vein endothelial cell-derived EA.hy926 cell barriers and human brain microvascular cells (BMEC), a human blood-brain barrier model, were studied. Uninfected monocyte/macrophages crossed endothelial cell barriers six times more efficiently than neutrophils. More E. chaffeensis-infected monocytes transmigrated than uninfected monocytes, whereas A. phagocytophilum suppressed neutrophil transmigration. Differences were not due to barrier dysfunction, as transendothelial cell resistivities were the same for uninfected cell controls. Similar results were obtained for HL-60 cells used as hosts for E. chaffeensis and A. phagocytophilum. Differential transmigration of E. chaffeensis- and A. phagocytophilum-infected leukocytes and HL-60 cells confirmed a role for the pathogen in modifying cell migratory capacity. These results support the hypothesis that Anaplasmataceae intracellular infections lead to unique pathogen-specific host cell functional alterations that are likely important for pathogen survival, pathogenesis, and disease induction.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCell Line, TransformedCell MovementEhrlichia chaffeensisEhrlichiosisEndothelial CellsHumansLeukocytesMicrocirculationUmbilical Veins

Identifiers

PMID14638757
PMCPMC308917
OpenAlexW2114789627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.