ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2003
Efficacies of vancomycin, arbekacin, and gentamicin alone or in combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro infective endocarditis model.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of potential inhibitors for Penicillinbinding protein (PBP) from Staphylococcus aureus.Bioinformation · 2018Article
- In vitro antibacterial activity and in vivo therapeutic effect of Sesbania grandiflora in bacterial infected silkworms.Pharmaceutical biology · 2017Article
- Comparison of Arbekacin and Vancomycin in Treatment of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media by Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015Article
- The efficacy and safety of arbekacin and vancomycin for the treatment in skin and soft tissue MRSA infection: preliminary study.Infection & chemotherapy · 2013Article
- The usefulness of arbekacin compared to vancomycin.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012Article
- Once-daily gentamicin administration for community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model: preliminary reports for the advantages for optimizing pharmacodynamic index.Yonsei medical journal · 2010Article
- In vitro activity effects of combinations of cephalothin, dicloxacillin, imipenem, vancomycin and amikacin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. strains.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2006Article
- Synergy of arbekacin-based combinations against vancomycin hetero-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.Journal of Korean medical science · 2006Article
- Nocardia arthritidis sp. nov., a new pathogen isolated from a patient with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We adopted an in vitro infective endocarditis model (IVIEM) to compare the efficacy of vancomycin (VAN), arbekacin (ABK), and gentamicin (GEN) alone or in combination. Using two strains of clinically isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, one GEN susceptible (GS171) and one GEN resistant (GR153), fibrin clots were prepared and suspended in the IVIEM. Antibiotics were given as boluses every 6 h (q6h), q12h, or q24h or by continuous infusion with VAN, q12h or q24h with ABK, and q8h or q24h with GEN. For combination treatment, VAN q12h plus ABK q24h and VAN q12h plus GEN q24h were given. Fibrin clots were removed from each model at 0, 8, 24, 32, 48, and 72 h, and the bacterial densities were determined. The number of colonies within the fibrin clot was significantly decreased in all study groups compared with control groups (P<0.001). When VAN and ABK were administered alone, the number of colonies was significantly lower in GS171 than in GR153 by 8 h after administration (P=0.02) and was lowest in GS171 when ABK was administered q12h (P=0.01). At 72 h, ABK or VAN alone produced equivalent bacterial reductions regardless of dosing frequency and GEN resistance. In GR153, VAN plus ABK showed an additive effect till 24 h, although VAN plus GEN showed indifference. Our data suggest that ABK could be used as an alternative to VAN in GEN-resistant staphylococcal endocarditis. An additive effect was seen when VAN and ABK were used together in GEN-resistant strains until 24 h; however, further studies are warranted for the clinical application of this combination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.