Trial reportAtencion primaria2003
[Protocol for the multi-centre evaluation of the Experimental Programme Promotion of Physical Activity (PEPAF)].
Trial report in Atencion primaria, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00131079 (Multi-center Evaluation of the Experimental Program for Physical Activity Promotion), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multi-center Evaluation of the Experimental Program for Physical Activity Promotion (PEPAF), Carried Out by Family Physicians
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for promoting physical activity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005Pooled it
- Physical exercise, fitness and dietary pattern and their relationship with circadian blood pressure pattern, augmentation index and endothelial dysfunction biological markers: EVIDENT study protocol.BMC public health · 2010Trial
- Changes in Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Probability of Developing Abdominal Obesity at One and Two Years.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Observational
- Predictors of long-term change of a physical activity promotion programme in primary care.BMC public health · 2014Article
- [On prescription of physical exercise].Atencion primaria · 2008Article
- Targeting physical activity promotion in general practice: characteristics of inactive patients and willingness to change.BMC public health · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of an innovative programme to promote physical activity (PEPAF) introduced into the daily consultations of the family doctor.
designClinical trial with control, randomised for groups of 100 patients seen by one of the 70 doctors taking part, allocated to two parallel groups and monitored for 24 months.Setting. 13 primary care centres coordinated through the Network of Research into Preventive and Health Promotion Activities conducted in primary care.
participantsSample with probability of 7000 sedentary patients, selected from among those who consulted for any reason their family doctor during the third quarter of 2003. Patients with cardiovascular disease or other problems meaning that exercise could cause adverse effects will be excluded.
interventionsThe doctors allocated to the PEPAF will design a plan of physical activity with those patients prepared to make the change. Those not prepared to will be briefly counselled and given material to help them. All will be monitored at random. The control group doctors will postpone any systematic intervention on exercise until after 2005, excepting those patients whose health problem is directly related to a sedentary life-style. MEASUREMENTS: The main measurement of results will be the increase in the level of physical activity from the base measurement to those at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, using 7-day physical activity recall. Health-related quality of life (SF 36) and physical fitness will also be measured. Variables that might be predictive or confusing, such as sex, age, comorbidity, social class, etc., will be considered. Analysis. The average changes observed in the two groups will be compared, on the basis of intention to treat, through analysis of covariance. We will use mixed-effect models able to cover the intra-patient, intra-doctor and intra-centre correlation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.