Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14626550›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2003

The use of medical records in research: what do patients want?

Nancy E Kass, Marvin R Natowicz, Sara Chandros Hull, Ruth R Faden, Laura Plantinga, Lawrence O Gostin, Julia Slutsman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. U.S. Vietnamese Parents' Perceptions of Different Approaches for Confirming Adolescent HPV Vaccination Records in Research Studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 21st Century Cures Act: ethical recommendations for new patient-facing products.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Preventing discrimination based on psychiatric risk biomarkers.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stakeholders' views on data sharing in multicenter studies.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2017
    Article
  20. Perspectives of Patients With Cancer on the Ethics of Rapid-Learning Health Systems.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nancy E KassDepartment of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA.
Marvin R Natowicz
Sara Chandros Hull
Ruth R Faden
Laura Plantinga
Lawrence O Gostin
Julia Slutsman

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Access to InformationAttitudeMedical RecordsBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicConfidentialityHumansInformed ConsentPatientsBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchEmpirical Approach

Identifiers

PMID14626550
PMCPMC4816216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.