Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14625785›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2004

Identification of differentially expressed cDNA sequences and histological characteristics of Hevea brasiliensis calli in relation to their embryogenic and regenerative capacities.

E Charbit, T Legavre, L Lardet, E Bourgeois, N Ferrière, M P Carron

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E CharbitCIRAD, Avenue Agropolis, TA 80/03, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
T Legavre
L Lardet
E Bourgeois
N Ferrière
M P Carron

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different friable Hevea callus lines from the same genotype can display different embryogenic and regenerative potentials. These lines can not be distinguished on the basis of macroscopic criteria. A histological and molecular study was undertaken to characterize the differences existing between five callus lines with different potentials. The genes differentially expressed during induction were analyzed using the differential display (DD-RT) technique. Twenty-eight cDNAs were found to be differentially expressed during induction in the embryogenic regenerating line (ER). Embryogenic nodules were formed earlier in the ER lines than in the embryogenic non-regenerating lines and were completely absent in the non-embryogenic line. Of these 28 cDNAs, five could be used to distinguish between calli prior to induction, thereby enabling an early diagnosis of friable Hevea callus embryogenic potential.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionRegenerationCell DifferentiationCell DivisionCulture MediaDNA, ComplementaryGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenetic MarkersHeveaTranscription, GeneticCulture MediaDNA, ComplementaryGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.