Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14624247›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2003

The genome sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: a platform for comparative genomics.

Lincoln D Stein, Zhirong Bao, Darin Blasiar, Thomas Blumenthal, Michael R Brent, Nansheng Chen, Asif Chinwalla, Laura Clarke, Chris Clee, Avril Coghlan and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 467 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
467citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

467 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 958 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. T2T genomes ofGenome research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Programmed DNA elimination was present in the last common ancestor ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. A gap-free, telomere-to-telomere genome assembly for thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

407 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Lincoln D SteinCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.. lstein@cshl.org
Zhirong Bao
Darin Blasiar
Thomas Blumenthal
Michael R Brent
Nansheng Chen
Asif Chinwalla
Laura Clarke
Chris Clee
Avril Coghlan
Alan Coulson
Peter D'Eustachio
David H A Fitch
Lucinda A Fulton
Robert E Fulton
Sam Griffiths-Jones
Todd W Harris
LaDeana W Hillier
Ravi Kamath
Patricia E Kuwabara
Elaine R Mardis
Marco A Marra
Tracie L Miner
Patrick Minx
James C Mullikin
Robert W Plumb
Jane Rogers
Jacqueline E Schein
Marc Sohrmann
John Spieth
Jason E Stajich
C Wei
David Willey
Richard K Wilson
Richard Durbin
Robert H Waterston
Washington University in St. Louis · USWellcome Sanger Institute · GBCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USUniversity of Washington · USBC Cancer Agency · CADuke University · USNew York University · USTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Missouri–St. Louis · US

Funding

Wormbase SupplementP41HG002223 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STERNBERG, PAUL WARREN · 2000 to 2012
$32.0M
Genetics Training Grant-Year 26T32GM007754 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAASE, STEVEN B · 1985 to 2019
$8.3M
TRANS-SPLICING IN C ELEGANSR01GM042432 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BLUMENTHAL, THOMAS · 1992 to 2011
$3.9M
YEAST SEQUENCINGP01HG000956 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WATERSTON, ROBERT H · 1993 to 2003
$2.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS 5P01 HG00956NHGRI NIH HHS 5U01 HG02042NHGRI NIH HHS P01 HG000956NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002223NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG02223NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM042432NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM42432NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007754NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM07754-22Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The soil nematodes Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis elegans diverged from a common ancestor roughly 100 million years ago and yet are almost indistinguishable by eye. They have the same chromosome number and genome sizes, and they occupy the same ecological niche. To explore the basis for this striking conservation of structure and function, we have sequenced the C. briggsae genome to a high-quality draft stage and compared it to the finished C. elegans sequence. We predict approximately 19,500 protein-coding genes in the C. briggsae genome, roughly the same as in C. elegans. Of these, 12,200 have clear C. elegans orthologs, a further 6,500 have one or more clearly detectable C. elegans homologs, and approximately 800 C. briggsae genes have no detectable matches in C. elegans. Almost all of the noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) known are shared between the two species. The two genomes exhibit extensive colinearity, and the rate of divergence appears to be higher in the chromosomal arms than in the centers. Operons, a distinctive feature of C. elegans, are highly conserved in C. briggsae, with the arrangement of genes being preserved in 96% of cases. The difference in size between the C. briggsae (estimated at approximately 104 Mbp) and C. elegans (100.3 Mbp) genomes is almost entirely due to repetitive sequence, which accounts for 22.4% of the C. briggsae genome in contrast to 16.5% of the C. elegans genome. Few, if any, repeat families are shared, suggesting that most were acquired after the two species diverged or are undergoing rapid evolution. Coclustering the C. elegans and C. briggsae proteins reveals 2,169 protein families of two or more members. Most of these are shared between the two species, but some appear to be expanding or contracting, and there seem to be as many as several hundred novel C. briggsae gene families. The C. briggsae draft sequence will greatly improve the annotation of the C. elegans genome. Based on similarity to C. briggsae, we found strong evidence for 1,300 new C. elegans genes. In addition, comparisons of the two genomes will help to understand the evolutionary forces that mold nematode genomes.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsBiological EvolutionCaenorhabditisCaenorhabditis elegansChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialCluster AnalysisCodonConserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularExonsGene LibraryGenomicsInterspersed Repetitive SequencesIntronsCodonMicroRNAsProteinsRNARNA, RibosomalRNA, Spliced LeaderRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID14624247
PMCPMC261899
OpenAlexW2090415636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.