ArticleBMC health services research2003
The requirement for prior consent to participate on survey response rates: a population-based survey in Grampian.
Article in BMC health services research, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of 'opt in' versus 'opt out' approaches.BMC medical research methodology · 2013Trial
- Trial
- Emotional overeating questionnaire: a validation study in Italian adults with obesity, overweight or normal weight.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2020Article
- Problems recruiting and retaining postnatal women to a pilot randomised controlled trial of a web-delivered weight loss intervention.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Outcomes in Child Health: Exploring the Use of Social Media to Engage Parents in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Postal recruitment and consent obtainment from index cases of narcolepsy.BMC medical ethics · 2016Article
- A telephone survey of factors affecting willingness to participate in health research surveys.BMC public health · 2015Article
- Ethnicity and neighbourhood deprivation determines the response rate in sexual dysfunction surveys.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- Factors affecting patients' trust and confidence in GPs: evidence from the English national GP patient survey.BMJ open · 2013Article
- Random sampling for a mental health survey in a deprived multi-ethnic area of Berlin.Community mental health journal · 2012Article
- Who doesn't authorize the linking of survey and administrative health data? A general population-based investigation.Annals of epidemiology · 2011Article
- Mouthwash use in general population: results from adult dental health survey in grampian, Scotland.Journal of oral & maxillofacial research · 2011Article
- Sleep quality, the neglected outcome variable in clinical studies focusing on locomotor system; a construct validation study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2010Article
- Challenges in evaluating Welfare to Work policy interventions: would an RCT design have been the answer to all our problems?BMC public health · 2010Article
- Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009Article
- Filaggrin null mutations and childhood atopic eczema: a population-based case-control study.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2008Article
- The effect of privacy legislation on observational research.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008Article
- Who are we missing? Area deprivation and survey participation.European journal of epidemiology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA survey was carried out in the Grampian region of Scotland with a random sample of 10,000 adults registered with a General Practitioner in Grampian. The study complied with new legislation requiring a two-stage approach to identify and recruit participants, and examined the implications of this for response rates, non-response bias and speed of response.
methodsA two-stage survey was carried out consistent with new confidentiality guidelines. Individuals were contacted by post and asked by the Director of Public Health to consent to receive a postal or electronic questionnaire about communicating their views to the NHS. Those who consented were then sent questionnaires. Response rates at both stages were measured.
results25% of people returned signed consent forms and were invited to complete questionnaires. Respondents at the consent stage were more likely to be female (odds ratio (OR) response rate of women compared to men = 1.5, 95% CI 1.4, 1.7), less likely to live in deprived postal areas (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.45, 0.78) and more likely to be older (OR for people born in 1930-39 compared to people born in 1970-79 = 2.82, 95% CI 2.36, 3.37). 80% of people who were invited to complete questionnaires returned them. Response rates were higher among older age groups. The overall response rate to the survey was 20%, relative to the original number approached for consent (1951/10000).
conclusionThe requirement of a separate, prior consent stage may significantly reduce overall survey response rates and necessitate the use of substantially larger initial samples for population surveys. It may also exacerbate non-response bias with respect to demographic variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.