Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14619962›Full record

ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry2003

Isoprostanes: more than just mere markers.

D J Crankshaw, P K Rangachari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rheumatoid Arthritis and Reactive Oxygen Species: A Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D J CrankshawHonours Biology-Pharmacology Coop Program, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
P K Rangachari
McMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isoprostanes are members of a family of prostaglandin isomers that are produced by free radical-catalysed mechanisms. They have become well-recognized indicators of oxidant-induced cell damage in a variety of pathophysiological conditions. Several isoprostanes have been shown to possess biological activity in whole-animal, isolated tissue and cell-based systems. Their actions include vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation and cardiac hypertrophy. Current evidence suggests that these effects are mediated by prostanoid receptors through a complex set of interactions that involve agonism, partial agonism, desensitization and co-operative behaviors. It is likely that other mechanisms of action are waiting to be discovered. Based on a consideration of these biological effects, we argue that isoprostanes are more than mere markers and may serve as active participants in promoting and exaggerating pathophysiological changes. To tease out their roles requires considerable more work and a willingness to suspend disbelief based on limited evidence.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersHumansIsoprostanesOxidative StressPlatelet AggregationVasoconstrictionBiomarkersIsoprostanes

Identifiers

PMID14619962
OpenAlexW36672453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.