Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14619954›Full record

ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry2003

Antimicrotubular drugs binding to vinca domain of tubulin.

Suvroma Gupta, Bhabatarak Bhattacharyya

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suvroma GuptaDepartment of Biochemistry, Bose Institute, Centenary Campus, Calcutta, India.
Bhabatarak Bhattacharyya
Bose Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on vinca domain binding drugs were done in great details by a number of workers as it is recognized as a potential target for anticancer drug development. Their structures, properties, mode of action, success and failures as potential anticancer drug have been discussed in short details in this review. Among these drugs rhizoxin and maytansine are competitive inhibitors, and bind at the vinblastine binding site of tubulin where as others are non-competitive inhibitors. Besides binding, these drugs also differ in the extent of GTP hydrolysis, GTP exchange and in the stabilization of colchicine binding site. The toxicity level of these drugs towards the host cells and the extent of efflux of drugs by the P-glycoprotein mediated pump are also discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBinding SitesHumansMicrotubulesProtein Structure, TertiaryTubulinTubulin ModulatorsVinca AlkaloidsAntineoplastic AgentsTubulinTubulin ModulatorsVinca Alkaloids

Identifiers

PMID14619954
OpenAlexW5517662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.