ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2003
[Practical advice for recovery and successful processing of anterior chamber puncture and vitrectomy samples].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Endogenous endophthalmitis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2007Review
- [Endogenous endophthalmitis. Nine cases in Greater Rostock 2003-2005].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2007Article
- [Classification of biomedical research reports as a reference for evidence-based medicine in ophthalmology. A survey considering as example the journal Der Ophthalmologe].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For the diagnosis of unclear intraocular inflammation which threatens visual acuity and does not respond to therapy, the collection of intraocular fluid from the anterior chamber or the vitreous body is sometimes required. After surgery the correct and speedy processing of the rapidly degrading fluid determines the quality and reliability of the laboratory results. This article describes the different steps which are important after surgery to ensure optimal results for the different diagnostic laboratory procedures. If specimens are to be sent to cytology or microbiology laboratories, processing directly after surgery is necessary, while material which has to undergo PCR analysis, should remain untreated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14618352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.