Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14616411›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2003

No clinically significant effect of erythromycin or azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in healthy male volunteers.

Lynn Purkins, Nolan Wood, Parviz Ghahramani, Diane Kleinermans, Gary Layton, Don Nichols

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. COVID-19 associated with pulmonary aspergillosis: A literature review.Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of flavin-containing monooxygenase in oxidative metabolism of voriconazole by human liver microsomes.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2008
    Article
  14. The pharmacological importance of cytochrome CYP3A4 in the palliation of symptoms: review and recommendations for avoiding adverse drug interactions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lynn PurkinsPfizer Global Research and Development, Sandwich, Kent CT13 9NJ, UK.
Nolan Wood
Parviz Ghahramani
Diane Kleinermans
Gary Layton
Don Nichols
Pfizer (United Kingdom) · GBErasmus Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe antibiotic erythromycin is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 metabolism. As CYP isozymes, including CYP3A4, are involved in the metabolism of the new triazole voriconazole, this study investigated the effects of multiple-dose erythromycin or azithromycin on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in healthy male subjects.

methodsIn an open, randomized, parallel-group, single-centre study, 30 healthy male subjects aged 20-41 years received oral voriconazole 200 mg twice daily for 14 days plus either erythromycin (1 g twice daily on days 8-14), azithromycin (500 mg once daily on days 12-14) or placebo (twice daily on days 8-14). Only morning doses were administered on day 14. Plasma concentrations of voriconazole were measured up to 12 h postdose on days 7 and 14, and plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Adverse events and standard laboratory test results were recorded before and throughout the study.

resultsComparison of the voriconazole Cmax day 14/day 7 ratio for the voriconazole + erythromycin group with that of the voriconazole + placebo group yielded a ratio of 107.7%[90% confidence interval (CI) 90.6, 128.0]; for the voriconazole + azithromycin group, the ratio was 117.5% (90% CI 98.8, 139.7). Comparison of the voriconazole AUCtau day 14/day 7 ratios of the voriconazole + erythromycin and voriconazole + azithromycin groups with that of the voriconazole + placebo group showed ratios of 101.2% (90% CI 89.1, 114.8) and 107.9% (90% CI 95.1, 122.4), respectively. For voriconazole tmax, the differences between the day 14-day 7 calculations for the voriconazole + erythromycin or the voriconazole + azithromycin groups and that of the voriconazole + placebo group were - 0.2 h (90% CI - 0.8, 0.3) and - 0.1 h (90% CI - 0.7, 0.5), respectively. None of these changes was considered clinically relevant. The study drugs were well tolerated by subjects in all groups; the most common study drug-related adverse events were visual disturbances, reported in all groups, and abdominal pain, present in the voriconazole + erythromycin group.

conclusionsCoadministration of erythromycin or azithromycin does not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in a clinically relevant manner in healthy male subjects.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsArea Under CurveAzithromycinDrug CombinationsDrug InteractionsErythromycinHumansMalePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazoleAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAzithromycinDrug CombinationsErythromycinPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID14616411
PMCPMC1884310
OpenAlexW1581861090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.