Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14615346›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

Communicating risks at the population level: application of population impact numbers.

Richard F Heller, Iain Buchan, Richard Edwards, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Patrick McElduff, Selwyn St Leger

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Inequality in COVID-19 mortality in Quebec associated with neighbourhood-level vulnerability domains.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  4. Model-based economic evaluation of ice cleat distribution programmes for the prevention of outdoor falls among adults from a Swedish societal perspective.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Communicating the benefits of breast feeding.Archives of disease in childhood · 2007
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Helping to prioritise interventions for depression and schizophrenia: use of Population Impact Measures.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2006
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Richard F HellerEvidence for Population Health Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT. dick.heller@man.ac.uk
Iain Buchan
Richard Edwards
Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Patrick McElduff
Selwyn St Leger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic MethodsHumansModels, TheoreticalPopulationRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID14615346
PMCPMC261823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.