Diagnostic decision support systems: how to determine the gold standard?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Celebrating Eta Berner and her influence on biomedical and health informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
   Article
2. Development and validation of algorithms to identify patients with chronic kidney disease and related chronic diseases across the Northern Territory, Australia.BMC nephrology · 2022
   Article
3. A Bayesian classification model for discriminating common infectious diseases in Zhejiang province, China.Medicine · 2020
   Observational
4. Using collective expert judgements to evaluate quality measures of mass spectrometry images.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015
   Article
5. Validation of a diagnostic reminder system in emergency medicine: a multi-centre study.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2007
   Article
6. Assessment of the potential impact of a reminder system on the reduction of diagnostic errors: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2006
   Article
7. Diagnostic decision support systems: why aren't they used more and what can we do about it?AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2006
   Article
8. Evidence-based databases versus primary medical literature: an in-house investigation on their optimal use.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2004
   Article
9. Informatics challenges for the impending patient information explosion.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Measuring the impact of diagnostic decision support on the quality of clinical decision making: development of a reliable and valid composite score.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as