Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14611665›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2003

Diversity in coding tandem repeats in related Neisseria spp.

Philip Jordan, Lori A S Snyder, Nigel J Saunders

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis for Salmonella enterica subspecies.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2011
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Meningococcal genome dynamics.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2006
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philip JordanBacterial Pathogenesis and Functional Genomics Group, The Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK. philip.jordan@pathology.oxford.ac.uk
Lori A S Snyder
Nigel J Saunders
University of Oxford · GBGenomics (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

MICROBIAL PATHOGEN GENOME PROJECT--NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAER01AI038399 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI DYER, DAVID W. · 1995 to 1998
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI-38399Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTandem repeats contained within coding regions can mediate phase variation when the repeated units change the reading frame of the coding sequence in a copy number dependent manner. Coding tandem repeats are those which do not alter the reading frame with copy number, and the changes in copy number of these repeats may then potentially alter the function or antigenicity of the protein encoded. Three complete neisserial genomes were analyzed and compared to identify coding tandem repeats where the number of copies of the repeat will have some structural consequence for the protein. This is the first study to address coding tandem repeats that may affect protein structures using comparative genomics, combined with a population survey to investigate which show interstrain variability.

resultsA total of 28 genes were identified. Of these, 22 contain coding tandem repeats that vary in copy number between the three sequenced strains, three strain specific genes were included for investigation on the basis of having >90% identity between repeated units, and three genes with repeated elements of >250 bp were included although no length variations were seen in the genomes. Amplification, and sequencing of repeats showing altered copy number, of these 28 coding tandem repeat containing regions, from a set of largely unrelated strains, revealed further repeat length variation in several cases.

conclusionEighteen genes were identified which have variation in repeat copy number between strains of the same species, twelve of which show greater diversity in repeat copy number than is present in the sequenced genomes. In some cases, this may reflect a mechanism for the generation of antigenic variation, as previously described in other species. However, some of the genes identified encode proteins with cytoplasmic functions, including sugar metabolism, DNA repair, and protein production, in which repeat length variation may have other functions. Coding tandem repeats appear to represent a largely unexplored mechanism of generating diversity in the Neisseria spp.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialGenetic VariationTandem Repeat SequencesAdhesins, BacterialAntigenic VariationAntigens, SurfaceBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesConserved SequenceFimbriae ProteinsLipoproteinsNeisseriaSpecies SpecificityAdhesins, BacterialAntigens, SurfaceBacterial ProteinsBacterial VaccinesFimbriae ProteinsLipoproteinspilQ protein, bacteria

Identifiers

PMID14611665
PMCPMC305346
OpenAlexW2171277158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.