Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14610677›Full record

ReviewPlanta2004

The plant nuclear envelope.

Annkatrin Rose, Shalaka Patel, Iris Meier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of LINC proteins in plant nuclear morphology.Plant signaling & behavior · 2008
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cysteine protease mcII-Pa executes programmed cell death during plant embryogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  15. Article
  16. New thioredoxin targets in the unicellular photosynthetic eukaryote Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annkatrin RoseDepartment of Plant Biology, The Ohio State University, 244 Rightmire Hall, 1060 Carmack Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Shalaka Patel
Iris Meier
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review summarizes our present knowledge about the composition and function of the plant nuclear envelope. Compared with animals or yeast, our molecular understanding of the nuclear envelope in higher plants is in its infancy. However, fundamental differences in the structure and function of the plant and animal nuclear envelope have already been found. Here, we compare and contrast these differences with respect to nuclear pore complexes, targeting of Ran signaling to the nuclear envelope, inner nuclear envelope proteins, and the role and fate of the nuclear envelope during mitosis. Further investigation of the emerging fundamental differences as well as the similarities between kingdoms might illuminate why there appears to be more than one blueprint for building a nucleus.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell NucleusNuclear EnvelopePlant CellsPlant Physiological PhenomenaPlant ProteinsPlantsSignal TransductionPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID14610677
OpenAlexW2069693508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.