Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2003
Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00725738 (Intracoronary Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 572 papers, 24 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intracoronary Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: TRACIA Study.
Who cites it
572 citing papers in PubMed, 24 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,479 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in pharmacological treatment of heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.European heart journal · 2026Pooled it
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Guideline
- Effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in patients with STEMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Future cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- The in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term risk of heart failure in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2024Pooled it
- Latin-American guidelines of recommendations at discharge from an acute coronary syndrome.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Effect of sacubitril-valsartan on left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced cough compared with placebo, and other antihypertensives: A systematic review, and network meta-analysis.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2023Pooled it
- Randomised controlled trials of antihypertensive therapy: does exclusion of orthostatic hypotension alter treatment effect? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2023Pooled it
- An updated systematic review on heart failure treatments for patients with renal impairment: the tide is not turning.Heart failure reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The benefits of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2021Pooled it
- Association between antihypertensive treatment and adverse events: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Pooled it
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and renin-angiotensin system blockers: A review and pooled analysis.Archives of cardiovascular diseases · 2020Pooled it
- 2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020Guideline
- 2020 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2020Guideline
- Clinical Practice Guideline of Integrative Chinese and Western Medicine for Acute Myocardial Infarction.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2020Guideline
- Clinical Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2020Guideline
- Assessing the risk of angiotensin receptor blockers on major cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
512 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAngiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors such as captopril reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity among patients with myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction, heart failure, or both. In a double-blind trial, we compared the effect of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan, the ACE inhibitor captopril, and the combination of the two on mortality in this population of patients.
methodsPatients receiving conventional therapy were randomly assigned, 0.5 to 10 days after acute myocardial infarction, to additional therapy with valsartan (4909 patients), valsartan plus captopril (4885 patients), or captopril (4909 patients). The primary end point was death from any cause.
resultsDuring a median follow-up of 24.7 months, 979 patients in the valsartan group died, as did 941 patients in the valsartan-and-captopril group and 958 patients in the captopril group (hazard ratio in the valsartan group as compared with the captopril group, 1.00; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.11; P=0.98; hazard ratio in the valsartan-and-captopril group as compared with the captopril group, 0.98; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.09; P=0.73). The upper limit of the one-sided 97.5 percent confidence interval for the comparison of the valsartan group with the captopril group was within the prespecified margin for noninferiority with regard to mortality (P=0.004) and with regard to the composite end point of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (P<0.001). The valsartan-and-captopril group had the most drug-related adverse events. With monotherapy, hypotension and renal dysfunction were more common in the valsartan group, and cough, rash, and taste disturbance were more common in the captopril group.
conclusionsValsartan is as effective as captopril in patients who are at high risk for cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. Combining valsartan with captopril increased the rate of adverse events without improving survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.