Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14609971›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2003

Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes.

Andrew Stiell, Alan J Forster, Ian G Stiell, Carl van Walraven

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01416857 (ED Disability Diagnostic Tool), which is not on this map. Cited by 80 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01416857 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

ED Disability Diagnostic Tool: a Health Information Technology Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2011 to 2014Enrolled635ConditionsDisability DiagnosisArmsRDDT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Impact of an electronic link between the emergency department and family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Availability of patient information in the emergency department : Wish and reality].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Validation of an electronic trigger to measure missed diagnosis of stroke in emergency departments.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew StiellClinical Epidemiology Unit, Ottawa Health Research Institute, ON.
Alan J Forster
Ian G Stiell
Carl van Walraven

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation gaps occur when previously collected information is unavailable to a physician who is currently treating a patient. In this study we measured the prevalence of physician-reported information gaps for patients presenting to an emergency department at a teaching hospital.

methodsFor 1002 visits to the emergency department made by 983 patients, we recorded all information gaps identified by the emergency physician immediately after the patient was assessed. When an information gap was present, the physician was asked to identify the required information, why it was required and how important it was to the patient's care. We reviewed the patient charts to measure severity of illness and to determine whether the patient was referred to the emergency department by a community physician. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine whether information gaps were associated with length of stay in the emergency department.

resultsAt least 1 information gap was identified in 323 (32.2%) of the 1002 visits (95% confidence interval 29.4%-35.2%). Information gaps were associated with severity of illness, being significantly more common in patients who had serious chronic illnesses, those who arrived by ambulance, those who had visited the emergency department or had been in hospital recently, patients in monitored areas in the emergency department and older patients. Information gaps most commonly comprised medical history (58%) and laboratory test results (23.3%) and were felt to be essential to patient care in 47.8% of the cases. The presence of information gaps was not associated with admission to hospital. After adjusting for important confounders, including patient sex, previous hospital admissions, diagnosis and severity of illness, we found that stays in the emergency department were 1.2 hours longer on average for patients with an information gap than for those without one.

interpretationInformation gaps were present in almost one-third of the visits to our emergency department. They were more common in sicker patients and were independently associated with a prolonged stay in the emergency department.

Indexed as

Medical RecordsPatient AdmissionConfidence IntervalsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID14609971
PMCPMC236227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.