ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2003
Comparison of spontaneous background genomic aberration frequencies among cattle, pig and humans using dual-colored FISH.
Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromosomal Aberrations in Cattle.Genes · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous frequencies of stable chromosomal aberrations in farm animals have not been established yet. The aim of this study was to determine the spontaneous background frequencies of structural chromosomal aberrations in cattle and pig, and to compare them with the established findings in humans. Analysis was carried out on peripheral blood samples taken from 29 cows, 15 calves, 15 boars, 13 piglets, and 23 adult and 12 newborn humans. Dual-colored FISH using whole chromosome painting probes specific for human chromosomes 1 and 4, bovine chromosomes 1 and 7, and pig chromosomes 1 and 13 was performed. Chromosome aberrations were classified according to the PAINT nomenclature. The proportions of aberrant cells and the genomic frequencies of translocations, insertions and dicentrics were measured. The highest background translocation frequency was observed in humans (1.40 +/- 0.92). Data obtained in boars were similar to those obtained in humans. Cows showed much lower values of studied parameters than was expected. There was no statistical difference in any category of aberration frequencies between cows and calves. Significant differences in genomic frequencies of both total and reciprocal translocations were found when comparing boars with piglets and adult humans with newborn babies. Very low levels of spontaneous background translocation frequencies were seen among calves, piglets and newborn human babies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.