Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14605872›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2004

Genetic and clinical mosaicism in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Ina Vandenbroucke, Remco van Doorn, Tom Callens, Jan M Cobben, Theo M Starink, Ludwine Messiaen

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Mosaic RASopathies.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2013
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Hereditary genodermatoses with cancer predisposition.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2010
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ina VandenbrouckeCentre for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185-0K5, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Remco van Doorn
Tom Callens
Jan M Cobben
Theo M Starink
Ludwine Messiaen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with typical features of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) limited to a specific body segment are usually referred to as having "segmental NF1", which is generally assumed to be the result of somatic mosaicism for a NF1 mutation. Mosaicism has also been demonstrated at the molecular level in some sporadic cases with phenotypically classic NF1. In the present report, we describe a patient with NF1 disease manifestations throughout the whole body, but leaving a few sharply delineated segments of the skin unaffected, suggestive of revertant mosaicism. A large intragenic deletion was found by mutation analysis using long-range RT-PCR. The intra-exonic breakpoints were characterized in exon 13 and exon 28, resulting in a deletion of 99,571 bp at the genomic level. The presence of two genetically distinct cell populations, confirming mosaicism for this NF1 mutation, was shown by analysis of several tissues. Revertant mosaicism was excluded by demonstrating heterozygosity for markers residing in the deletion region. The findings in this patient demonstrate two things: (1) although the entire body is affected, mosaicism can still be suspected at clinical examination and proven by DNA analysis and skin biopsies; (2) long-range RT-PCR is a feasible method for demonstrating large intragenic deletions in NF1.

Indexed as

AdultBase SequenceBiopsyDNA Mutational AnalysisExonsFeasibility StudiesFemaleGenetic MarkersHeterozygoteHumansMosaicismNeurofibromatosis 1Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSequence DeletionSkinGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.