ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2003
Twofold symmetries in nucleotide distribution in large domains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chromosome I.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single stranded chains of biological DNA show a widespread occurrence of parity for complementary nucleotides, i.e., A=T, G=C. This has been referred to as A-T, G-C symmetry. A distinction must be made between this, which this paper calls mirror symmetry, and twofold symmetry, where complementary nucleotide parity occurs between two segments, of the same length and equidistant from a symmetry center, along a single-stranded DNA chain. I have analysed the sequence of Chromosome I of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the occurrence of complementary nucleotide symmetry. Open reading frame (ORF) sequences made up 63% of the total chromosome length and most of them were asymmetric for both A-T and G-C. The sign of A-T asymmetry was correlated with transcriptional orientation (A>T for sense and A<T for antisense ORFs), whereas G-C asymmetry was not. However, long single-stranded segments of Chromosome I were A-T mirror symmetric because they contained similar frequencies of ORFs in both transcriptional orientations. The same results were obtained with the AA-TT pair of complementary dinucleotides. Profiling of AA-TT symmetry along Chromosome I showed this chromosome to be organized as a succession of five domains that were twofold symmetric for AA-TT, placed between two subtelomeric regions without clear symmetry properties. This pattern was destroyed when ORF sequences were randomly repositioned along the chromosome. Based on the above findings, an architectural model is proposed for Chromosome I, in which the twofold symmetric domains, from 30 to 50 kb long, correspond to chromosome loops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.