Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14598882›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2003

Immunization with a vaccine that combines the expression of MUC1 and B7 co-stimulatory molecules prolongs the survival of mice and delays the appearance of mouse mammary tumors.

Vitaly Vasilevko, Anahit Ghochikyan, Nadya Sadzikava, Irina Petrushina, Mike Tran, Edward P Cohen, Patrick J Kesslak, David H Cribbs, Garth L Nicolson, Michael G Agadjanyan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vitaly VasilevkoDepartment of Molecular Immunology, The Institute for Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, California 92649-1041, USA.
Anahit Ghochikyan
Nadya Sadzikava
Irina Petrushina
Mike Tran
Edward P Cohen
Patrick J Kesslak
David H Cribbs
Garth L Nicolson
Michael G Agadjanyan
University of California, Irvine · USInstitute for Molecular Medicine · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Multiple Approaches to Abeta Vaccination in Animal ModelsR01AG020241 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI AGADJANYAN, MICHAEL G, CRIBBS, DAVID HASTINGS · 2001 to 2016
$5.6M
MECHANISM OF DIFFERENTIATION OF FUNCTION OF CD80 &CD86R01AI044809 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AGADJANYAN, MICHAEL G · 2000 to 2004
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI44809NIA NIH HHS R01 AG20241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human epithelial mucin (MUC1) is expressed by many carcinomas, including breast cancer cells. This breast cancer-associated antigen has been widely used for immunotherapy, despite the fact that cellular immune responses to MUC1 are impaired in breast cancer patients and MUC1 transgenic animals. Previously, we found that immunogenicity to MUC1 was also impaired in BALB/c mice injected with a mammary tumor cell line (410.4) expressing human MUC1. We suggested that one reason for its weak immunogenicity was the lack of expression of B7 molecules by 410.4 cells. Recognition of antigenic epitopes in conjunction with MHCI/II by the T-cell receptor without co-stimulation by B7/CD28 association resulted in T-cell anergy. Therefore, we attempted to enhance protective anti-MUC1-specific immunity in mice using B7 co-stimulatory molecules as a component of the MUC1 vaccine. We also compared cell-based with DNA-based vaccination strategies. One group of mice was vaccinated with an irradiated, 410.4 syngeneic mammary tumor cell line co-expressing human MUC1 and CD80 or CD86 co-stimulatory molecules, and a second group of mice was vaccinated with plasmids encoding MUC1 and CD80 or CD86. These mice along with appropriate controls were challenged with mammary tumor cell line 4T1, which expresses MUC1. There were significant inhibition on rates of tumor growth and survival in mice vaccinated with irradiated 410.4/MUC1 cells co-expressing either CD80 or CD86 molecules, compared to non-vaccinated animals. In addition, there were also significant delays in the appearance of measurable tumors and their growth in mice vaccinated by gene-gun immunization with plasmids encoding MUC1 and CD80 or CD86.

Indexed as

AnimalsB7-1 AntigenCancer VaccinesCell DivisionFemaleHumansMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C3HMucin-1Survival RateTime FactorsVaccines, SyntheticB7-1 AntigenCancer VaccinesMucin-1Vaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID14598882
OpenAlexW2127460725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.