Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14598173›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2003

Open-surgery management of morbid obesity: old experience-new techniques.

Bernhard Husemann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Body contouring surgery in the massive weight loss patient].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernhard HusemannDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Clinic of Dominikus-Krankenhaus, 40549, Düsseldorf, Germany. chirurgie@dominikus.de
Regionalverbund kirchlicher Krankenhäuser · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bariatric surgery is well established to treat morbidly obese patients (BMI >40 kg/m(2)) with various techniques. Gastric-restriction procedures [adjustable gastric band, vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG)] reduce caloric intake and are well accepted (weight loss up to BMI 28-33 kg/m(2) after 5 years), but they are less effective in super-obese patients and in sweet-eaters. For that group combined techniques, such as duodenal switch, gastric bypass or bilio-pancreatic diversion, could produce a better weight loss (between 60 and 160 kg or BMI of 25-30 kg/m(2)) with acceptable long-term side effect; however, due to malabsorption, a lack of minerals and vitamins, even protein, could occur and have dangerous side effects. Both basic techniques have their place in the treatment of morbid obesity. The surgical approach-open or mini-invasive-is only of minor importance. Technical complications should be avoided, especially band dislocation (2-12%) or suture leak. Long-term follow-up is very important because obesity is a chronic disease with a high risk of recurrence, even after bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

Biliopancreatic DiversionFollow-Up StudiesGastric BypassGastroplastyHumansLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsTime FactorsWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID14598173
OpenAlexW2012437460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.