Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14598165›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2003

Evolution and microsynteny of the apyrase gene family in three legume genomes.

S B Cannon, W R McCombie, S Sato, S Tabata, R Denny, L Palmer, M Katari, N D Young, G Stacey

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Legume genome evolution viewed through the Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Organization and evolution of resistance gene analogs in peanut.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2005
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

S B CannonDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
W R McCombie
S Sato
S Tabata
R Denny
L Palmer
M Katari
N D Young
G Stacey
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USUniversity of Minnesota · USKazusa DNA Research Institute · JPUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apyrases have been suggested to play important roles in plant nutrition, photomorphogenesis, and nodulation. To help trace the evolution of these genes in the legumes--and possibly, the acquisition of new functions for nodulation--apyrase-containing BACs were sequenced from three legume genomes. Genomic sequences from Medicago truncatula, Glycine max and Lotus japonicus were compared to one another and to corresponding regions in Arabidopsis thaliana. A phylogenetic analysis of apyrase homologs from these regions and sequences from other legume species, as well as other plant families, identified a potentially legume-specific clade that contains a well-characterized soybean ( G. soja) apyrase, Gs52, as well as homologs from Dolichos, Lotus, Medicago and Pisum. Sister clades contain homologs from members of Brassicaceae, Solanaceae, Poaceae and Fabaceae. Comparisons of rates of change at synonymous and nonsynonymous sites in the Gs52 and sister clades show rapid evolution in the potentially legume-specific Gs52 clade. The genomic organization of the apyrase-containing BACs shows evidence of gene duplication, genomic rearrangement, and gene conversion among Gs52 homologs. Taken together, these results suggest a scenario of local apyrase gene duplication in an ancestor of the legumes, followed by functional diversification and increased rates of change in the new genes, and further duplications in the Galegae (which include the genera Medicago and Pisum). The study also provides a detailed comparison of genomic regions between two model genomes which are now being sequenced ( M. truncatulaand L. japonicus), and a genome from an economically important legume species ( G. max).

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSyntenyApyraseChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialFabaceaeGene DuplicationGenetic VariationGenomeModels, GeneticPhylogenySequence HomologyApyrase

Identifiers

PMID14598165
OpenAlexW2155827187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.