ArticleInflammation1992
Adhesive effect of certain cytokines and other perturbants on human neutrophils.
Article in Inflammation, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of proinflammatory cytokines on the interplay between roxithromycin, HMR 3647, or HMR 3004 and human polymorphonuclear neutrophils.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2000Article
- Flow cytometric approach to human polymorphonuclear leukocyte activation induced by gingival crevicular fluid in periodontal disease.Inflammation · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pretreatment of normal human neutrophils with certain cytokines and other mediators caused some of the cells to become adhesive and stick to the plastic (polypropylene) incubation tubes during pretreatment and during the assay for phagocytosis of C3b.IgG-coated microspheres. Often as much as 40% of the cells were adherent to the tubes after the reaction. This sticking of the neutrophils to the plastic tubes was confirmed by increase in cytometer sipping time and by lactic dehydrogenase assay of the suspended cells and of the cells stuck on the sides of the empty incubation tubes. Only those perturbants that caused an up-regulation of C3b receptors (CR1, CD35) and in most cases caused an enhancement of phagocytosis mediated the adhesiveness of the cells. Unless these stuck cells were detached by vigorous flushing with cold buffer containing EDTA, many of the cells were not admitted into the cytometer for determination of the effect of the perturbants on binding and phagocytic capacity of the neutrophils. This observation could have implications regarding the possibility of subpopulations of neutrophils and differences in function of adherent cells versus cells in suspension. In the cases studied there was no appreciable difference between the total binding and phagocytic capacities of the adherent and suspended cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.