Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14594958›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2003

Treatment for newly diagnosed hypertension: patterns of prescribing and antihypertensive effectiveness in the UK.

Tom Walley, Andy K Duggan, Alan R Haycox, Christie J Niziol

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Non-persistence to antihypertensive drug therapy in Lithuania.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Individuals at risk of beta-blocker discontinuation: a cohort study in 19,177 Chinese patients.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2010
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Choice of first antihypertensive--are existing guidelines ignored?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2007
    Review
  19. Hypertension guideline recommendations in general practice: awareness, agreement, adoption, and adherence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom WalleyDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK. T.Walley@liverpool.ac.uk
Andy K Duggan
Alan R Haycox
Christie J Niziol
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved practice in the management of hypertension depends on an understanding of existing patterns of treatment. To describe the management of newly diagnosed hypertension in British general practice and the effectiveness of current prescribing patterns we conducted a retrospective observational study using data from a computerized general practitioner record database (DIN-LINK). 21 024 patients were first treated for newly diagnosed hypertension between January 1993 and December 1997, and were followed for 4 years. Diuretics or beta-blockers were the most widely prescribed first-line treatments, used in 54% of patients. The mean continuation rate for first-line therapy was 69% at 12 months: the continuation rate was highest for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor antagonists. After 12 months of treatment the mean blood pressure reduction was 19/10 mmHg. Blood pressure targets were met in only 14% of patients. After 48 months of treatment 34% of patients had not improved in band of blood pressure severity. Many patients with severe hypertension at 12 months were still being prescribed only one drug. The lack of aggression in antihypertensive treatment, indicated by the low number of agents prescribed and the failure to achieve targets, is disappointing. Prescribing patterns for first-line therapy corresponded to guidelines. Continuation rates on first-line therapy were higher than often reported. The choice of drug for additions to or switches from first-line therapy had no clear pattern. Routinely collected computerized data could be used to support clinical governance activities in primary care.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID14594958
PMCPMC539623
OpenAlexW2104200630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.