Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14593043›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2003

Resuscitating clinical research in the United Kingdom.

John Bell, Working Group of Academy of Medical Sciences

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. How to attract, retain and nurture young academic clinicians.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2011
    Article
  10. Is the use of sentient animals in basic research justifiable?Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2010
    Review
  11. [Organization of clinical research: in a large scale department for cardiothoracic surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A novel foundation-year-two post in academic medicine.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John BellOffice of the Regius Professor, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford PX3 9DU. regius@medical-sciences-office.oxford.ac.uk
Working Group of Academy of Medical Sciences

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCareer MobilityFinancing, OrganizedHealth Services ResearchInformed ConsentInternational CooperationPrimary Health CarePublic OpinionResearch Support as TopicState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID14593043
PMCPMC261667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.