Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14586665›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2003

The role of radiofrequency in the treatment of mechanical pain of spinal origin.

Y Pevsner, S Shabat, A Catz, Y Folman, R Gepstein

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Factors determining the success of radiofrequency denervation in lumbar facet joint pain: a prospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Y PevsnerThe Spine Unit, Sapir Medical Center, 48 Tchernichovsky St, 44281 Kfar-Saba, Israel.
S Shabat
A Catz
Y Folman
R Gepstein

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a method that has been gaining popularity over the past few years among spinal surgeons. It has a role when dealing with pain of spinal origin, either mechanical or neuropathic, after conservative treatment has failed. In the present study, 122 patients with a minimal follow up of 1 year were examined at our institution after having undergone RF heat lesion of the medial branch for mechanical spinal pain (low back pain, thoracic pain or cervical pain). They were followed up 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Twenty-two of them were additionally followed up at 18 months. After 1 month, 91 patients (75%) were satisfied with the results. After 3 months, 87 patients (71%) had significant pain relief, while in 35 patients (29%) there was no improvement. After 6 months of follow-up, 80 patients (66%) had pain relief and in 42 patients (34%) there was no effect. At 12-months follow-up, 77 patients (63%) showed good results and 45 patients (37%) had no effect. In the case of the 22 patients who were followed for 18 months, all showed significant pain relief. Minor complications occurred in 27 patients (22%), who had transient discomfort and burning pain. We concluded that RF is a safe and partially effective procedure for mechanical back pain.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBack PainCatheter AblationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementSpinal DiseasesSpinal NervesSpineTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID14586665
PMCPMC3467995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.