Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14586507›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2004

Targeted mapping of a sugarcane rust resistance gene (Bru1) using bulked segregant analysis and AFLP markers.

C Asnaghi, D Roques, S Ruffel, C Kaye, J-Y Hoarau, H Télismart, J C Girard, L M Raboin, A M Risterucci, L Grivet and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Identification of Causal Agents of Rust ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

C AsnaghiCIRAD, UMR 1096, TA40/03, avenue Agropolis, 34398, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
D Roques
S Ruffel
C Kaye
J-Y Hoarau
H Télismart
J C Girard
L M Raboin
A M Risterucci
L Grivet
A D'Hont
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRAgropolis International · FRBP (United Kingdom) · GBInstitute of Plant Protection · CNUniversity of Reunion Island · RE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of a major resistance gene (Bru1) for brown rust in the sugarcane cultivar R570 (2n about 115) was confirmed by analyzing segregation of rust resistance in a large population of 658 individuals, derived from selfing of clone R570. A subset of this population was analyzed with AFLP and bulked segregant analysis (BSA) to develop a detailed genetic map around the resistance gene. Four hundred and forty three primer pairs were used resulting in the identification of eight AFLP markers surrounding the resistance gene in an interval of 10 cM, with the closest markers located at 1.9 and 2.2 cM on each side of the gene. Efficiency of the AFLP/BSA applied to the complex polyploid genome of sugarcane is discussed, as well as the potential of the newly identified AFLP markers for developing a map-based cloning approach exploiting, synteny conservation with sorghum.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingBasidiomycotaDNA PrimersImmunity, InnatePlant DiseasesPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSaccharumDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID14586507
OpenAlexW2036071050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.