Trial reportPharmacy world & science : PWS2003
Community pharmacy based provision of pharmaceutical care to older patients.
Trial report in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pharmacist-led interventions to improve medication adherence in older adults: A meta-analysis.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Pooled it
- Interventions for improving medication-taking ability and adherence in older adults prescribed multiple medications.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Deprescribing interventions and their impact on medication adherence in community-dwelling older adults with polypharmacy: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2019Pooled it
- Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- A systematic review of the outcomes reported in trials of medication review in older patients: the need for a core outcome set.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Pooled it
- Impact of strategies to reduce polypharmacy on clinically relevant endpoints: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Pooled it
- Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacist-led fee-for-services medication review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effect of outpatient pharmacists' non-dispensing roles on patient outcomes and prescribing patterns.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- A systematic review of interventions to improve medication taking in elderly patients prescribed multiple medications.Drugs & aging · 2008Pooled it
- Interventions for improving older patients' involvement in primary care episodes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of shared pharmaceutical care for older patients: RESPECT trial findings.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010Trial
- Effectiveness of shared pharmaceutical care for older patients: RESPECT trial findings.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010Trial
- Pharmaceutical care for elderly patients shared between community pharmacists and general practitioners: a randomised evaluation. RESPECT (Randomised Evaluation of Shared Prescribing for Elderly people in the Community over Time) [ISRCTN16932128].BMC health services research · 2004Trial
- Identification, classification, and documentation of drug related problems in community pharmacy practice in Europe: a scoping review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Strategies to Improve Therapeutic Adherence in Polymedicated Patients over 65 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Evolutionary trend analysis of the pharmaceutical management research field from the perspective of mapping the knowledge domain.Frontiers in health services · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo measure the outcomes of a harmonized, structured pharmaceutical care programme provided to elderly patients by community pharmacists.
methodA randomised, controlled, longitudinal, clinical trial with repeated measures was performed over an 18-month period, involving community pharmacies (5 intervention and 5 control) in Northern Ireland. Elderly, ambulatory patients (> or = 65 years), taking 4 or more prescribed medications were eligible for participation. Patients attending an intervention pharmacy received education on medical conditions, implementation of compliance strategies, rationalizing of drug regimens and appropriate monitoring; patients attending control sites received normal services. A battery of clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes were assessed.
resultsA significantly higher proportion of intervention patients were compliant at the end of the 18-month study and experienced fewer problems with medication compared to control patients (P < 0.05). There was little impact on quality of life and health care utilisation.
conclusionsPharmaceutical care provision to community-dwelling patients resulted in an improvement in medication compliance and evidence of cost-savings. Future pharmaceutical care studies may benefit from a more focussed selective approach to data collection and outcomes measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
14584229What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.