Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14584021›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Etanercept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

B Blumenauer, M Judd, A Cranney, A Burls, D Coyle, M Hochberg, P Tugwell, G Wells

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03172325 (A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Double-blind, Parallel, Active Controlled Clinical Trial to Determine the Non-inferior Efficacy and Safety of CinnoRA®), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03172325 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Double-blind, Parallel, Active Controlled Clinical Trial to Determine the Non-inferior Efficacy and Safety of CinnoRA® (Adalimumab, CinnaGen Co.) Versus Humira® for Treatment of Active RA

TypeinterventionalSponsorCinnagenRan2015 to 2017Enrolled136ConditionsActive Rheumatoid ArthritisArmsAdalimumab, Methotrexate, Folic Acid, Prednisolone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biologic interventions for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Efficacy and safety of infliximab-biosimilar compared to other biological drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed treatment comparison.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Etanercept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia in rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Golimumab for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  8. Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  9. Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  10. Anakinra for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  11. Adalimumab for treating rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005
    Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The relationship between change in subjective outcome and change in disease: a potential paradox.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2010
    Article
  19. A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: a Cochrane overview.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

B Blumenauer
M Judd
A Cranney
A Burls
D Coyle
M Hochberg
P Tugwell
G Wells
University of Ottawa · CAOttawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEtanercept is a soluble tumour necrosis factor alpha-receptor DMARD for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of etanercept for the treatment of RA. SEARCH STRATEGY: Five electronic databases were searched from 1966 to February 2003 with no language restriction. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials (minimum 6 month duration) comparing three possible combinations 1) etanercept (10 mg or 25 mg twice weekly) with methotrexate (MTX) to MTX alone 2) etanercept to MTX, or 3) etanercept to placebo were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the trails. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set of disease activity measures for RA clinical trials, radiographic, withdrawals and toxicity outcomes were analyzed. MAIN

resultsThree trials were included in this review. Two trials compared an experimental group who were started on etanercept compared to a control group; both groups had the same ongoing background therapy of nonsteroidals in both trials plus in one trial one group was on stable methotrexate. In these two trials the ACR 20, ACR 50 and ACR 70 response rates at 6 months were statistically significantly and clinically important with etanercept 25 mg subcutaneous injections (SC) twice weekly. Sixty-four percent of people receiving etanercept ache vied an ACR 20 response compared to 15% of controls and the number needed to treat (NNT) with etanercept is 2 people. Thirty-nine percent of those receiving etanercept achieved an ACR 50 response compared to 4% of taking control treatment and the NNT is three. Fifteen percent of people taking etanercept achieved an ACR 70 compared to 1% of controls with a NNT of 7 people. In the third trial of starting etanercept compared to starting methotrexate the number of participants who achieved an ACR 20, 50 or response at 6 and 12 months were not statistically significant for either etanercept dose. Etanercept treatment showed a statistically significantly and clinically important affect on joint damage as measured by the Sharp erosion score. Among participants who received etanercept 72% had no increase in their erosion score compared to 60% of participants in the methotrexate group. Withdrawal and toxicity results were acceptable. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsEtanercept 25 mg SC twice weekly was more efficacious than control treatment for ACR 20, 50 and 70 at 6 months, and over 12 months it slowed joint damage.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidEtanerceptHumansImmunoglobulin GMethotrexateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorAntirheumatic AgentsEtanerceptImmunoglobulin GMethotrexateReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor

Identifiers

PMID14584021
OpenAlexW4253916031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.