Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14583994›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Combined corticosteroid and longacting beta-agonist in one inhaler for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

L Nannini, T J Lasserson, P Poole

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

L NanniniPulmonary Section, Hospital G. Baigorria, Ruta 11 Y Jm Estrada, G. Baigorria, Santa Fe - Rosario, Argentina, 2152. nanninilj@cimero.org.ar
T J Lasserson
P Poole
Hospital Provincial de Rosario · ARSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids have been recommended in guidelines for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, they have only been available until recently via separate administration. They have been developed in order to facilitate adherence to medication regimens, and to improve efficacy.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy of combined inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist preparations in the treatment of adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trials register (March 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2003), LILACS (all years to March 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they were randomised, with adequate blinding procedures in place. Studies could compare a combined inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonist preparation with either component preparation or placebo. Studies comparing different members of each class of combined therapies were included DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN

resultsFour randomised trials with 2986 participants were included. Two different combination preparations (fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol) were studied in the trials. No meta-analysis on clinical outcomes was possible due to different outcome assessment across studies. All studies demonstrated a reduction in exacerbation rates versus placebo. Budesonide/formoterol was more effective than formoterol in reducing exacerbations in one study from 1.84 to 1.42 exacerbations per year. Fluticasone/salmeterol did not significantly reduce exacerbations compared with either of its component treatments. Fluticasone/salmeterol led to better quality of life compared with placebo (two studies), although there were conflicting results when compared with inhaled corticosteroid alone (two studies). There was no significant difference between fluticasone/salmeterol and long-acting beta-agonist (two studies). Budesonide/formoterol led to statistically significant differences in quality of life compared with placebo, but not when compared with component inhaled corticosteroid or beta-agonist (one study). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsFor the primary outcome of exacerbations, budesonide/formoterol had a modest advantage over a component medication, formoterol, in a single trial, but fluticasone/salmeterol did not result in a significant reduction in exacerbations compared to either of its components. The combination of steroids and long-acting beta-agonist in one inhaler was effective in improving symptoms compared with placebo and on certain clinical outcomes compared with one of the individual components alone. In order to draw firmer conclusions about the effects of combination therapy in a single inhaler more data are necessary, including the assessment of the comparative effects with separate administration of the two drugs in double-dummy trials.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AgonistsAlbuterolAndrostadienesBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluticasoneFormoterol FumarateHumansNebulizers and VaporizersPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSalmeterol XinafoateAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAlbuterolAndrostadienesBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluticasoneFormoterol FumarateSalmeterol Xinafoate

Identifiers

PMID14583994
OpenAlexW2135064022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.