SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003
Early discharge with home support of gavage feeding for stable preterm infants who have not established full oral feeds.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early discharge with home support of gavage feeding for stable preterm infants who have not established full oral feeds.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Nutritional support in children and young people with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Early discharge with home support of gavage feeding for stable preterm infants who have not established full oral feeds.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Nasal versus oral route for placing feeding tubes in preterm or low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Trial
- Oral and nonoral sensorimotor interventions facilitate suck-swallow-respiration functions and their coordination in preterm infants.Early human development · 2012Trial
- Identification and Assessment of Systematic Reviews for Evidence-Based Guideline Recommendations on Follow-Up of Preterm Born Children: A Mapping Review.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Review
- Improving nutrition in pediatric heart failure.JHLT open · 2025Review
- Premature Babies Can Be Cared for in the Maternity Ward without an Increased Risk and Discharged with a Feeding Tube If Necessary.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Safety and Parental Satisfaction With Early Discharge of Preterm Infants on Nasogastric Tube Feeding and Outpatient Clinic Follow-Up.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants: Frequency, Associated Comorbidities, and Long-term Outcomes.The Journal of pediatrics · 2019Article
- Inadequate oral feeding as a barrier to discharge in moderately preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019Article
- Early discharge of premature infants < 37 weeks gestational age with nasogastric tube feeding: the new standard of care?European journal of pediatrics · 2019Article
- Outcomes of Infants With Home Tube Feeding: Comparing Nasogastric vs Gastrostomy Tubes.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2017Article
- Early Discharge of Preterm Infants- An Indian Perspective.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- Impact of prematurity and co-morbidities on feeding milestones in neonates: a retrospective study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly discharge of stable preterm infants still requiring gavage feeds has the potential benefits of uniting families sooner and reducing health care and family costs compared to discharge home when on full sucking feeds. Potential disadvantages include the increased burden for the family and the possibility of complications related to gavage feeding.
objectivesTo determine the effects of a policy of early discharge of stable preterm infants with home support of gavage feeding compared with a policy of discharge of such infants when they have reached full sucking feeds. SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used together with additional searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003), CINAHL (1982 to April week 1 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003 week 15) and MEDLINE (1966 to April week 1 2003). SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised and quasi-randomised trials among infants born <37 weeks and requiring no intravenous nutrition at the point of discharge were included. Trials were required to compare early discharge home with gavage feeds and health care support with later discharge home when full sucking feeds were attained. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN
resultsData from one quasi-randomised trial, with 88 infants from 75 families, were included in the review. Infants in the early discharge program with home gavage feeding had a mean hospital stay that was 9.3 days shorter [MD -9.3 (-18.49 to -0.11)] than infants in the control group. Infants in the early discharge program also had a lower risk of clinical infection during the home gavage period compared with the corresponding time in hospital for the control group [RR 0.35 (0.17 to 0.69)]. There were no significant differences between groups in duration and extent of breast feeding, weight gain, re-admission within the first 12 months post discharge from the home gavage program or from hospital, scores reflecting parental satisfaction, or health service use. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsExperimental evidence to evaluate the benefits and risks in preterm infants of early discharge from hospital with home gavage feeding compared with later discharge upon attainment of full sucking feeds is limited to the results of one small quasi-randomised controlled trial. High quality trials with concealed allocation, complete follow-up of all randomised infants and adequate sample size are needed before practice recommendations can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.